Table of contents
In this article
Technical page · Serving
Measuring inference performance
TTFT, inter-token latency and goodput
- Published
- 8 November 2026
- Last reviewed
- 8 November 2026
- Re-checked every
- 180 days
- Reviewed by
- Ales Analytics engineering
In one paragraph
Inference performance is measured from the user's side: how long until the first token appears, how smoothly the rest streams, and how long the whole answer takes, at the load the system will really carry. Throughput alone hides whether users are waiting, so the headline measure is goodput, the highest request rate at which a stated share of requests meet the latency targets.
How it works
| Measure | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Time to first token (TTFT) | Queueing plus prefill |
| Inter-token latency (ITL) | Time between streamed tokens; decode speed |
| End-to-end latency | Whole response |
| Throughput | Tokens per second across all users |
| Goodput | Highest rate at which, for example, 95% of requests meet both TTFT and ITL targets |
Report p50, p95 and p99, not averages.
Design choices and trade-offs
- Workload realism. Prompt and output lengths drawn from real traffic, and the real degree of prefix sharing. Identical prompts overstate a system with prefix caching; random prompts understate it.
- Open or closed load. A fixed arrival rate (open loop) shows queueing; a fixed number of users (closed loop) does not.
- Tools. GuideLLM and vLLM's benchmark suite are common options.
When not to use it
Batch jobs that run overnight care about total time and cost, not TTFT.
How we evaluate it
Every reported number states hardware, engine version, model and quantisation, prompt distribution, concurrency and the targets used.
Sources
- GuideLLM (opens in a new tab)
- Inference performance, which defines goodput with a worked example
Should you have any questions regarding this page, please contact us at solutions@alesanalytics.com.